Firefox Contributors’ Quick Reference¶
Some parts of this process, including cloning and compiling, can take a long time even on modern hardware. If at any point you get stuck, please don’t hesitate to ask at https://chat.mozilla.org in the #introduction channel.
Clone the sources¶
You can use either mercurial or git. Mercurial is the canonical version control system.
$ hg clone https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/
For git, see the git cinnabar documentation
The clone can take from 40 minutes to two hours (depending on your connection) and the repository should be less than 5GB (~ 20GB after the build).
If you have any network connection issues and cannot clone with command, try Mercurial bundles.
Install dependencies (non-Windows)¶
Firefox provides a mechanism to install all dependencies; in the source tree:
$ ./mach bootstrap
The default options are recommended. If you’re not planning to write C++ or Rust code, select Artifact Mode and follow the instructions at the end of the bootstrap for creating a mozconfig file.
You need 64-bit version of Windows 7 or later.
Download and install Visual Studio Community Edition.
Finally download the MozillaBuild Package. Installation directory should be:
Before moving on to the next steps, make sure to fulfill the Windows prerequisites
All the commands of this tutorial must be run in the shell provided with the MozillaBuild Package (start-shell.bat)
To build & run¶
Once all the dependencies have been installed, run:
$ ./mach build
which will check for dependencies and start the build. This will take a while; a few minutes to a few hours depending on your hardware.
The default build is a compiled build with optimizations. Check out the mozconfig file documentation to see other build options. If you don’t plan to change C++ or Rust code, an artifact build will be faster.
To run it:
$ ./mach run
To write a patch¶
Make the changes you need in the codebase. You can look up UI text in Searchfox to find the right file.
# Mercurial $ hg commit # Git $ git commit
The commit message should look like:
Bug xxxx - Short description of your change. r?reviewer Optionally, a longer description of the change.
Make sure you include the bug number and at least one reviewer (or reviewer group) in this format.
To find a reviewer or a review group, the easiest way is to run
hg log <modified-file> (or
git log <modified-file>, if
you’re using git) on the relevant files, and look who usually is
reviewing the actual changes (ie not reformat, renaming of variables, etc).
To visualize your patch in the repository, run:
# Mercurial $ hg wip # Git $ git show
To make sure the change follows the coding style¶
To detect coding style violations, use mach lint:
$ ./mach lint path/to/the/file/or/directory/you/changed # To get the autofix, add --fix: $ ./mach lint path/to/the/file/or/directory/you/changed --fix
To test a change locally¶
To run the tests, use mach test with the path. However, it isn’t always easy to parse the results.
$ ./mach test dom/serviceworkers
To test a change remotely¶
Running all the tests for Firefox takes a very long time and requires multiple operating systems with various configurations. To build Firefox and run its tests on continuous integration servers (CI), two commands are available:
$ ./mach try chooser
To select jobs running a fuzzy search:
$ ./mach try fuzzy
From Treeherder (our continuous integration system), it is also possible to attach new jobs. As every review has a try CI run associated, it makes this work easier. See Attaching new jobs from a review for more information.
This requires level 1 commit access.
You can ask your reviewer to submit the patch for you if you don’t have that level of access.
To submit a patch¶
To submit a patch for review, we use a tool called moz-phab. To install it, run:
$ ./mach install-moz-phab
Once you want to submit your patches (make sure you use the right commit message), run:
It will publish all the currently applied patches to Phabricator and inform the reviewer.
If you wrote several patches on top of each other:
$ moz-phab submit <first_revision>::<last_revision>
To update a submitted patch¶
It is rare that a reviewer will accept the first version of patch. Moreover, as the code review bot might suggest some improvements, changes to your patch may be required.
# Mercurial $ hg commit --amend # Git $ git commit --amend
After amending the patch, you will need to submit it using moz-phab again.
hg commit --amend -m or
git commit --amend -m.
Phabricator tracks revision by editing the commit message when a
revision is created to add a special
--amend -m is used, that line will be lost, leading to
the creation of a new revision when re-submitted, which isn’t
the desired outcome.
If you wrote many changes, you can squash or edit commits with the command:
# Mercurial $ hg histedit # Git $ git rebase -i
The submission step is the same as for the initial patch.
Retrieve new changes from the repository¶
To pull changes from the repository, run:
# Mercurial $ hg pull --rebase # Git $ git pull --rebase
To push a change in the code base¶
Once the change has been accepted and you’ve fixed any remaining issues the reviewer identified, the reviewer should land the patch.
If the patch has not landed on “autoland” (the integration branch) after a few days, feel free to contact the reviewer and/or @Aryx or @Sylvestre on the #introduction channel.
The landing procedure will automatically close the review and the bug.
Contributing to GeckoView¶
Note that the GeckoView setup and contribution processes are different from those of Firefox; GeckoView setup and contribution docs live in geckoview.dev.